[Mailman-Developers] Fixing DMARC problems with .invalid munge

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

SM writes:

 > >RFCs must be shown to work in practice before they become Proposed
 > >Standards.  Ie, don't expect something to work until you see it.
 > 
 > This is a nit.  There isn't any requirement that RFCs have to be 
 > shown to work in practice  before they become Proposed Standards.

Don't you have that backwards?  It's pointing out lack of a formal
hard requirement that is nit-picking.  After all, Postel's Principle
isn't written in any IETF procedure manual.  Would you call that one a
"nit", too?