[Mailman-Developers] Fixing DMARC problems with .invalid munge

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

SM writes:
 > Hi Stephen,
 > At 23:28 05-05-2014, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
 > >Don't you have that backwards?  It's pointing out lack of a formal
 > >hard requirement that is nit-picking.  After all, Postel's Principle
 > >isn't written in any IETF procedure manual.  Would you call that one a
 > >"nit", too?
 > 
 > I labelled my previous comment as a nit (the previous comment was 
 > unimportant).  I would not describe anything someone else writes as a nit.

OK, thanks for the apology.  And sorry on my part for assuming you
were calling the (informal) rule a nit.