[Mailman-Developers] Mailman introducing spurious References: or In-Reply-To: headers?

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On 10/27/2014 02:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 06:59 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>> over on dns-privacy at ietf.org, one of the participants (Hosnieh Rafiee,
>> cc'ed here) suggests that mailman appears to be introducing spurious
>> References: and In-Reply-To: headers (see the attached message below for
>> some of the discussion.
>>
>> Can you confirm whether this is a function of mailman (e.g. to try to
>> merge threads between people whose MUAs don't properly set In-Reply-To:
>> or References:?  If so, is there anything we can do to avoid it
>> happening in the future?
> 
> Mailman does not do this. Mailman, at least standard GNU Mailman, does
> not alter References: or In-Reply-To: headers in any way.

Thanks for the followup, Mark.

	--dkg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20141027/04c400e3/attachment-0001.sig>