[Mailman-Developers] MM3 install on RHEL 5.11
Bill.Costa at unh.edu
Bill.Costa at unh.edu
Thu May 28 17:13:13 CEST 2015
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> kindly posted, in part...
> A tough question. How adventuresome are you?
Well a former boss had a saying that I've taken to heart. "Don't
be first. Don't be last." Are there *any* production MM 3 sites
up at this point?
> There is a big advantage for you in going straight to MM 3 and
> that is you won't miss those MM 2.1 features that haven't yet
> been implemented in MM 3. ;)
The Pareto principle (also known as the 80–20 rule) seems to
apply to so many things, especially computer apps. ListProc is
crufty but featureful. Yet for 15+ years it has been running
here, list owners have pretty much used only a small set of all
the available features. So I don't have any concerns there. And
on the plus side, the Google/Yahoo Groups-like features of
HyperKitty should be a real win for my list owners and
subscribers.
> I hesitate to advise you on a path here. There are pro and con
> arguments for both, but I *think* if I were in your place, I
> would at least try MM3.
At this stage I agree -- it is worth trying to kick the tires on
MM 3. But without a detailed install manual for a typical list
admin as verses a Python developer, it looks like it is going to
be a slog.
> I'm not sure about the pip issue, but how about yum? See
> <http://wiki.bazaar.canonical.com/DistroDownloads#CentOS.2FRHEL>
So far I've been build stuff from source, perhaps for no good
reason.
...BC
--
=====================================[ Bill.Costa at unh.edu ]==
Bill Costa
1 Leavitt Lane
UNH IT -- 1st Floor
University of New Hampshire
Durham, NH 03824
USA
Voice: +1-603-862-3056
No good deed... Goes unpunished.
===========================[ http://pubpages.unh.edu/~wfc ]==
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list