[Mailman-Developers] Postorius issue tracker labels

[Terri Oda]

On 2016-06-04 3:23 PM, Simon Hanna wrote:
>
>>> I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it
>> might be
>>> more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to
>> indicate bugs
>>> that occur due to mailmanclient.
>>
>> 'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use the term
>> 'mailman'
>> for the whole umbrella project.  'wait-for-core' is a little better but
>> it
>> doesn't accurately describe blockers on mailman.client.
>> 'wait-for-api'?  I'm
>> also okay with leaving it as it us until/unless we figure out something
>> better.
>
> In most cases I think we would have to wait for both core and mailmanclient. Thats why I don't think we need two labels for it.
> In my opinion it would be better to have only one label and always link to an issue in mailmanclient and/or core

We actually changed it to be just "blocked" so it can refer to any thing 
we might be waiting on, including things just in client, things in core 
and client, and other issues, since that turned out to be useful for triage.

  Terri