[Mailman-Developers] Patch for HyperArch
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Mar 12 19:21:56 EST 2016
Mark Sapiro writes:
> On 03/12/2016 08:23 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Mark Sapiro writes:
> >
> > > The Received: header check is important. For an "imported" mbox, the
> > > From_ separators may reflect when the mbox was exported from it's source
> > > rather than the message date. If the messages have Received: headers,
> > > the later ones at least tend to have good dates.
> >
> > Overengineering (seems to be becoming a habit?) perhaps, but if you're
> > going to parse one Received field, why not do them all, sort, and take
> > the latest reasonable one? Leaving the sorted list on msg_data might
> > also be useful to spam filters (although we don't really want to
> > recommend spam filtering in Mailman...).
>
>
> I see your point,
About "overengineering"? :-)
Gotcha on the rest, but "overengineered, yes" was you needed to say.
(I guess the "header field contents are in a list ordered as you would
expect datum" is generally useful though. Thanks for explaining that,
even if it's not part of the spec.)
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list