[Mailman-Developers] Encrypted lists predictable difficulties and implementation needs

[Jan Jancar]

On 03/22/2017 04:02 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Also references to existing knowledge would be appreciated, such as
> "zero knowledge" schemes that might allow untrusted root on Mailman
> host, and the various implementations like SELS that have been
> mentioned.

In my proposal [1 or 2], I concluded that a SELS like proxy encryption
scheme doesn't apply well to Mailman's existing infrastructure as well
as the stated requirements in the project idea.

-Jan

(Just to note, I have recently updated my proposal, make sure to have
the latest version)
[1]: https://neuromancer.sk/page/gsoc/mailman#technical-details
[2]: https://neuromancer.sk/static/mailman.pdf

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20170323/08206cd0/attachment.sig>