[Mailman-Users] setting the reply to for a list
Marc Merlin
marc_news at valinux.com
Wed Dec 8 21:44:34 CET 1999
On mer, déc 08, 1999 at 02:22:28 -0500, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> > Actually what I'd need as options for Reply-To is:
> > - none
> > - reply to list
> > - reply to sender (to force replies off list)
> > - reply to other Email.
>
> If you do 3, you're overriding the Reply-To the sender himself set, and that's
> a bad thing. If you want replys to go to the sender, use 1. Personally, I
Yes, I'm a strong believer in setting reply to considered harmful
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
However, I'm also tired of bonehead users who hit group reply every single
time. However, what mailman should probably offer is:
2a reply to list no matter what
2b reply to list only if reply-to isn't already set
3a reply-to sender no matter what
3b reply-to sender only if reply-to isn't already set
4a reply to other Email no matter what
4b reply to other Email only if reply-to isn't already set.
I'd personally never use 2a, 3a, or 4a, but even if I consider them bad
choices, I don't like to take choice away from people.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to software what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ (friendly to non IE browsers)
Finger marc_f at merlins.org for PGP key and other contact information
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list