[Mailman-Users] Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] [ANNOUNCE] Mailman 1.0b9
J C Lawrence
claw at kanga.nu
Thu Mar 4 06:12:51 CET 1999
On 03 Mar 1999 18:33:42 +0100
Harald Meland<Harald.Meland at usit.uio.no> wrote:
> As this (currently) is a non-standard header, I wouldn't feel good
> about putting explicit support for it into Mailman. However, a more
> general "Add this header (standard or not) (if it doesn't exist
> already) to all messages to this list" might be good. But not for
> 1.0, methinks.
This has my vote, as well as a set of pages to configure MailMan's
defaults for all other lists. *THAT* would be incredibly useful
especially for corporate sites (I'm trying to roll out MailMan at VA
Note: The default business should work as follows: All list config
are either "default" or deviations from default. Ergo, if a list is
configured and MailMan's defaults are later changed, the following
-- if the value is the same as the prior default, change the value
to the new default.
-- if the value was changed from the prior default, leave it at its
> There are lots of other good candidates for user configurable
> options concerning outgoing list messages: Adding a Reply-To:
> header, including the list footer, including the list header, and of
> course VERP.
I'd love an option to support only MIME digests and to turn off
support for RFC (forget number) digests. I'd also love an option to
set a Reply-To specific to digests and different from the list config
for individual messages (I set it to a
Please.Do.Not.Reply.to.Digests.Burst.Instead at whereever).
Version 1.x stuff.
J C Lawrence Internet: claw at kanga.nu
----------(*) Internet: coder at kanga.nu
...Honorary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
More information about the Mailman-Users