> And an example of why MX isn't granular enough: > > 197935 74 74 1071.19 remote.elynxx at MIT.EDU > 197935 74 74 301.06 remote.gyouxx at MIT.EDU I don't understand why an MX would have different delays per _recepient_. In general it accepts the mail, hangs up the SMTP connection, and _then_ tries to deliver it. Thanks Bruce