[Mailman-Users] How about this for the error message?
Dionysos at Dionysia.org
Tue Mar 23 16:37:09 CET 1999
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
> I agree that it's obtrusive, but "oh by the way", the "defacto-standard"
> (which I believe Mailman follows, at least I've never gotten a complaint
> about it) is that signatures start with a double dash line, then
> carriage-return... al'la "--\n(.*)" Which means that it's getting
> confused where the "start" of your signature is... just so you know
> what's happening.
Point taken. But the sig was just an example. The example used a
week or so ago was when someone actually sends a message meant for a
human to the -request address. Now THAT would generate an obtrusive
reply! In that case, the "ignore after four unrecognized lines" idea
would be awefully helpful.
Daniel G. Delaney * Dionysos at Dionysia.org * www.Dionysia.org/~dionysos
PGP Public Key: http://Dionysia.org/~dionysos/pgp5.html
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and stupidity--
and I'm not sure about the former."
More information about the Mailman-Users