[Mailman-Users] accents in subjects
Christopher P. Lindsey
lindsey at mallorn.com
Fri Feb 25 17:00:06 CET 2000
> > However it's not only a question of 'Réf.' but of any
> > accentuated Subject: when it comes to the digest issue. So mailman is
> > also a little faulty here.
> Not really. You cannot have 8 bit characters in header lines - the
> character set etc applies to the body, so that subject is broken to
> start with.
This is perfectly legal. RFC 2047 supercedes RFC 822 and defines
character encoding within headers, including the Subject: header.
> [from previous message]
> > Usually it get morphed from
> > Réf. : confirmation of subscription - request 170967
> > into something like
> > =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9f._:_confirmation_of_subscription_--_request_170967?=
> so some MTA is converting the broken subject into some form of MIMEish
> encapsulation - basically coping with a broken message by applying a
> semi-broken workaround.
Regarding the use of Ref: vs. Re:, there's nothing in RFC 822 that
requires it to be one way or another. Subject: is defined as a
*text type, which expands to "any CHAR, including bare CR & bare LF, but
NOT including CRLF".
> not sure you want mailman to start doing conversions around other
> people's breakage. One possibility might be to make the subject line
> have more of a key in it hopefully picked to not have char set
> implications - say that kast part be [[CONFIRM#170967]] and just look
> for that style tag ignoring everything else in the line - making sure
> that the tags chosen don't get hit by those 8 bit conversion problems.
I agree that this is a better solution.
More information about the Mailman-Users