[Mailman-Users] 2.0 stable release coming soon?

[Mentor Cana]

I had the same problem with approving a message to a list of 7400+
subscribers. It was distributed twice before I checked the log/smpt
file. Immediately I went into the qfile/ dir and erased any other
instances that had to do with this particular message. I believe that this
message would have been distributed multiple times if I had not done the
deletion.

On another list with about 2000 subscribers, messages get distributed
twice. 

The list with smaller number of subscribers do not have this problem.

later,
mentor

On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, at 10:59, Rob Flickenger wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> 
> > b3 is being cleaned up now. Dunno what'll happen after that. FWIW, 
> > the current CVS stuff is quite stable.
> 
> Actually, I just tried the CVS snapshot from Friday.  It fixed the big list
> issues of 2.0b2, but looks like it worked all too well (from logs/smtp) :
> 
> Jun 10 04:37:13 2000 (23568) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 23096.518 seconds
> Jun 10 04:37:21 2000 (22842) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 33899.683 seconds
> Jun 10 04:37:31 2000 (22324) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 37070.565 seconds
> Jun 10 04:37:37 2000 (23390) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 26705.674 seconds
> Jun 10 04:37:44 2000 (23055) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 30302.589 seconds
> ...
> Jun 10 06:08:34 2000 (23758) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 24970.258 seconds
> Jun 10 06:32:28 2000 (24049) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 22774.820 seconds
> ...
> Jun 10 08:02:51 2000 (24269) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 24636.424 seconds
> ...
> Jun 10 09:12:01 2000 (24519) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 25183.795 seconds
> ...
> Jun 10 10:17:14 2000 (24797) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 25463.907 seconds
> Jun 10 10:33:37 2000 (25147) smtp for 58925 recips, completed in 22879.930 seconds
> 
> We ended up with eleven copies of the same message to 59K people in the
> queue, on a list that was admin-only and that I personally ok'd only once
> on friday afternoon.  (Shame on me for not checking the smtp log after
> sending, but as it seemed to go out without trouble, and as 59K messages
> take quite a long time to deliver, I didn't notice until 5 had been
> actually sent...) 
> 
> So, has anybody else running the new snapshot on a big list seen this yet?
> (I do feel silly asking the above as it seems criminally negligent on my
> part, but it's a looooong story...)
> 
> --Rob
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailman-Users maillist  -  Mailman-Users at python.org
> http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
>