[Mailman-Users] Re: [Mailman-Developers] Reverting question
simon at uow.edu.au
Tue Nov 14 06:57:49 CET 2000
I have to agree here. Not being able to override the reply-to: fields on
lists is a *MAJOr* problem. I've also had this problem with my lists. And I
was hoping for a 'fix' but it looks like it's intended behaviour?.
I think if thats going to be the case there should be another option. 'Force
list replyto' .
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:43:23AM -0500, Phil Barnett wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2000, at 0:32, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> > >>>>> "PB" == Phil Barnett <midnight at the-oasis.net> writes:
> > PB> Am I likely to encounter problems going from 2.0rc2 to 2.0b6?
> > Do you mean downgrading? Don't do that! If you really mean from
> > 2.0b6 to 2.0rc2 then you should be fine. Any data formats that need
> > updating will get updated automatically.
> I specifically mean downgrading. I have a hornets nest on my
> hands and I'm about to lose my lists back to egroups.
> This lack of reply to the list 'updated feature' has them HEATED.
> Perhaps I'm not clear. If I lose them to egroups, there is no point to
> me running Mailman anymore.
> This 'upgraded feature' is suicidal for Mailman on my machine.
> Phil Barnett mailto:midnight at the-oasis.net
> WWW http://www.the-oasis.net/
> FTP Site ftp://ftp.the-oasis.net
> Mailman-Developers mailing list
> Mailman-Developers at python.org
Simon Coggins (SAGE-AU Member) Email: simon at uow.edu.au
Network and System Management Officer Phone: +61-2-4221-3775
Information Technology Systems (ITS) Mobile: 0408 115861
University of Wollongong, 2522, Australia Fax: +61-2-4229-1985
More information about the Mailman-Users