[demime-l] Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Demime is what's killing my archives!!!
njs at scifi.squawk.com
Wed Nov 15 01:31:07 CET 2000
At 02:07 PM 11/12/2000 -0500, Bennett Todd wrote:
>2000-11-12-10:04:24 Nick Simicich:
>> Tom's suggestion [ wrap demime in something to save the From
>> line ] is a good quick hack, but has a problem. It will hide
>> demime's return code.
>How about if it were coded like
>listname: "|(read f;echo $f;exec
>Seems to me that wrapping ought to pass the From line along, then
>leave the rest of the job to demime, with no extra processes left
>around cluttering up the symbol table, or concealing exit codes.
This is what I used to recommend. However, I discovered that any demime
failure would be hidden and only the RC from the last process in the stage
What is new in 98a is that you can specify a syntax like
and demime will report either its own rc or the rc of the other program if
one is non-zero.
We will fight for bovine freedom, And hold our large heads high.
We will run free, with the buffalo or die! Cows with Guns.
- Dana Lyons, Cows With Guns
Nick Simicich mailto:njs at scifi.squawk.com
http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html -- Stop by and Light Up The World!
More information about the Mailman-Users