[Mailman-Users] Re: cleartext passwords

J C Lawrence claw at kanga.nu
Mon Oct 2 21:32:18 CEST 2000


On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:17:55 -0700 
Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui at plaidworks.com> wrote:

> At 11:48 AM -0700 10/2/00, J C Lawrence wrote:

>> -- Web-originated commands (subscribe, unsubscribe, settings etc)
>> are exactly the same.  They reply with a confirm message just
>> like the above UNLESS they are additionally authenticated with a
>> previously established password.

> I don't think you need the password here. Mailback validation is
> fine, because it proves ownership (or at least access to) the
> email address. If you're being attacked, and they can read your
> e-mail, being subscribed to a mail list is the LEAST of your
> problems. No sense making the mail list service more secure than
> your e-mail account.

Its purely there so that someone away from their normal accounts can 
continue to operate.  Look at it this way:

Given the confirm business:

  Authentication is two level: you know the subscription address and
  you get mail sent to it.

Given a password:

  Authentication is two level: you know the subscription address and 
  the password associated with it.

-- 
J C Lawrence                                 Home: claw at kanga.nu
---------(*)                               Other: coder at kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/        Keys etc: finger claw at kanga.nu
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--




More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list