[Mailman-Users] argh!! more problems

Tib tib at tigerknight.org
Thu May 10 00:57:33 CEST 2001


I'm afraid it doesn't - here's an example:

[root at unica mailman]# ls -lR lists/|grep config.db
-rw-rw----    1 nobody   mail         9759 May  9 14:14 config.db
-rw-rw----    1 nobody   mail         9759 May  9 14:14 config.db.last
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail        16876 May  9 15:27 config.db
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail        16876 May  9 15:26 config.db.last
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         2865 May  3 04:03 config.db
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         2865 May  3 04:03 config.db.last
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         3775 May  9 12:00 config.db
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         3775 May  8 17:00 config.db.last
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         5123 May  9 14:08 config.db
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         5123 May  9 14:08 config.db.last
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         3149 May  9 12:00 config.db
-rw-rw----    1 mailman  mail         3149 May  8 17:00 config.db.last
[root at unica mailman]# ./bin/check_perms
/home/mailman/archives/private/notopic/index.html bad gid (has: mailman,
expected mail)
/home/mailman/archives/private/distrib/index.html bad gid (has: mailman,
expected mail)
Problems found: 2

It sounds as though the check_perms script would have found all of these in
error.. ?

<EOL>
Tib


On Wed, 9 May 2001, Dan Mick wrote:

> Apparently you didn't read what I said.
>
> > -rw-rw----    1 nobody   mail        16875 May  8 18:16
> > /home/mailman/lists/thelist/config.db
>
> is not group mailman.  That would be the problem, and I have to believe
> that check_perms would find it, too.
>
> > > The web server writes it.  This is not a problem, because it's owned
> > > by group mailman, and write permissions are granted to group mailman.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailman-Users maillist  -  Mailman-Users at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
>





More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list