[Mailman-Users] argh!! more problems
Tib
tib at tigerknight.org
Thu May 10 00:57:33 CEST 2001
I'm afraid it doesn't - here's an example:
[root at unica mailman]# ls -lR lists/|grep config.db
-rw-rw---- 1 nobody mail 9759 May 9 14:14 config.db
-rw-rw---- 1 nobody mail 9759 May 9 14:14 config.db.last
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 16876 May 9 15:27 config.db
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 16876 May 9 15:26 config.db.last
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 2865 May 3 04:03 config.db
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 2865 May 3 04:03 config.db.last
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 3775 May 9 12:00 config.db
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 3775 May 8 17:00 config.db.last
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 5123 May 9 14:08 config.db
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 5123 May 9 14:08 config.db.last
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 3149 May 9 12:00 config.db
-rw-rw---- 1 mailman mail 3149 May 8 17:00 config.db.last
[root at unica mailman]# ./bin/check_perms
/home/mailman/archives/private/notopic/index.html bad gid (has: mailman,
expected mail)
/home/mailman/archives/private/distrib/index.html bad gid (has: mailman,
expected mail)
Problems found: 2
It sounds as though the check_perms script would have found all of these in
error.. ?
<EOL>
Tib
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Dan Mick wrote:
> Apparently you didn't read what I said.
>
> > -rw-rw---- 1 nobody mail 16875 May 8 18:16
> > /home/mailman/lists/thelist/config.db
>
> is not group mailman. That would be the problem, and I have to believe
> that check_perms would find it, too.
>
> > > The web server writes it. This is not a problem, because it's owned
> > > by group mailman, and write permissions are granted to group mailman.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailman-Users maillist - Mailman-Users at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
>
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list