[Mailman-Users] Re: mailmanctl -s
khera at kcilink.com
Fri Dec 12 21:53:21 CET 2003
>>>>> "WY" == Will Yardley <william+mm at hq.newdream.net> writes:
>> When the system goes down uncleanly, you *want* manual intervention to
>> ensure things are really ok. Otherwise, why bother even having that
>> check in place?
WY> In theory, perhaps. But in reality, what we want is for Mailman to
WY> If the system has been rebooted, it's not possible for any processes to
WY> already be running (before the startup script runs), so it seems fairly
WY> unlikely that any stale locks would be significant.
And you know for certain that no other files were corrupted and
horribly broken? I don't.
More information about the Mailman-Users