[Mailman-Users] Mailman Content Filtering Vs. PRE-Mailman Filtering
Jeremy Butler
jbutler at ua.edu
Sat Mar 15 18:44:47 CET 2003
I'm trying to figure out the BEST way to do content filtering with
Mailman: (1) through Mailman's own content filtering or (2) through a
dedicated filter (e.g., Procmail Email Sanitizer) that processes mail
BEFORE Mailman sees it.
In Mailman's favor is the convenience of having the filter built-in and, I
presume, a more efficient use of resources.
But in favor of Sanitizer (or another filter) is greater flexibility in the
processing of attached files. One can quarantine/defang/scan for viruses
in misbehaving file attachments.
I've read in the Mailman FAQ about how to filter incoming mail before it
hits Mailman (using Procmail), but my question is a more philosophical one:
SHOULD one pre-filter email before it gets to Mailman?
And if one should instead rely on Mailman for filtering, could someone
provide samples of what they've used for
filter_mime_types
pass_mime_types
Thanks!
P.S. I'm using Mailman 2.2.1 with Postfix on a RedHat 8 system.
Jeremy Butler
jbutler at ua.edu
========================================================
TELEVISION: CRITICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS
www.TVCrit.com
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list