[Mailman-Users] auto-rejecting BCCs?

[Tokio Kikuchi]

Sorry that I was so noizy by myself. :-P

Tokio Kikuchi wrote:

> AAYEE!!
> 
> This doesn't work AT ALL! You will get deep recursive hold for 
> administrative notices. I should look into the code.
> 
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> 
>> Sorry, my mistake.
>>
>>> Go to admin -> privacy -> spam page and put following in spam filter 
>>> rule 1:

               \nto:.*your-list-name

>> There was Delivered-To: header in my test message this matched.
>>
>>> and set this to Accept. Then, click Add new item (after this one)
>>> and put

               . (anything match)

>>> and set this to Reject or Discard.
>>> Do not forget to click [Submit Your Changes].

'\n' is needed for the first rule because the headers are concatnated in 
a single string. Also, do not add '@your.dom.ain' in it because this 
doesn't match 'your-list-name-owner at your.dom.ain' which is the held 
notice destination and they are held and held again. (If you discard, 
that's OK.)

>>>
>>> I've not fully tested but this should work. You can first set the 
>>> second rule to Hold and check the effect.

I will fully test net time. ;-P
>>>
>>> Cheers,

Tokio