[Mailman-Users] auto-rejecting BCCs?
tkikuchi at is.kochi-u.ac.jp
Tue Feb 22 13:59:33 CET 2005
Sorry that I was so noizy by myself. :-P
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> This doesn't work AT ALL! You will get deep recursive hold for
> administrative notices. I should look into the code.
> Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> Sorry, my mistake.
>>> Go to admin -> privacy -> spam page and put following in spam filter
>>> rule 1:
>> There was Delivered-To: header in my test message this matched.
>>> and set this to Accept. Then, click Add new item (after this one)
>>> and put
. (anything match)
>>> and set this to Reject or Discard.
>>> Do not forget to click [Submit Your Changes].
'\n' is needed for the first rule because the headers are concatnated in
a single string. Also, do not add '@your.dom.ain' in it because this
doesn't match 'your-list-name-owner at your.dom.ain' which is the held
notice destination and they are held and held again. (If you discard,
>>> I've not fully tested but this should work. You can first set the
>>> second rule to Hold and check the effect.
I will fully test net time. ;-P
More information about the Mailman-Users