[Mailman-Users] Re: Reply-to problem

[Mark Sapiro]

Brad Knowles wrote:

>At 12:24 PM +0100 2005-02-24, Joakim Nomell wrote:
>
>>  Correction, the reply-to-header is not missing (my Pine didn't show it).
>>  it looks like this in some cases:
>>
>>  Reply-To: User <user at domain.se>,
>>     Hackerlistan <hacker at smartlist.nu>
>
>	This means that the mailing list has added it's e-mail address to 
>the list of addresses to which a reply should be sent.  In this case, 
>it was folded onto the next line, but it should still be valid.
>
>	This seems to be working fine to me.

If you don't want this behavior, i.e. if you wan't to throw away the
OP's Reply-To:, set first_strip_reply_to to Yes.

--
Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan