[Mailman-Users] virtual host in subscribe url
rower at movieeditor.com
Sun Feb 26 19:36:00 CET 2006
Thank you! Excellent answer. You're right that it was formerly cpanel.
Just wondering, isn't it a bug that by default virtual hosts Mailman
namespaces collide? Why should it be considered normal to require a
patch to support virtual hosts properly? In the web pages you referred
me to there's some griping that cpanel was slow to share the patch. Why
no rush to adopt it?
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> The former URL looks like one that would come from a cPanel
> installation or perhaps one that uses other patches mentioned in
> Your 'new' URL is the correct one for a standard Mailman install. The
> only reason to consider anything else is a requirement to support
> lists with the same list name on different virtual hosts. Mailman as
> distributed doesn't do this. See the above FAQ article for more info.
More information about the Mailman-Users