[Mailman-Users] Verifying posts
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Jan 29 17:28:05 CET 2006
>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Popovitch <jimpop at yahoo.com> writes:
Jim> Hi all, I've been looking into TMDA (http://tmda.net) and got
Jim> to wondering if something like this (or a subset of it)
Jim> should be incorporated into Mailman.
There was a thread about this in the fairly recent past, perhaps it
was on mailman-developers, though. IIRC the consensus was "making
this more trouble than it's worth is not going to be easy".
In the interest of preempting a flamewar, let me note here that
challenge-response systems are a hot button for at least one of the
frequent posters on this list, and it would be a good idea to review
past threads and be prepared for those arguments.
There was another thread on mailman-developers about a month ago
regarding the idea of weeding out unused addresses, although the
policy proposed there was significantly more aggressive.
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the Mailman-Users