[Mailman-Users] Trying to tighten up my security...
Jon D. Slater
Jon.Slater at LPBroadband.Net
Thu Jul 20 05:58:46 CEST 2006
Okay... Next hitch...
I installed the patch, and tested it (by trying to send an e-mail to the
group from an e-mail that I knew wasn't in the group). It was rejected (as
I just had an e-mail get through from a non-member!
The e-mail is from: "Bernardo Spicer" <BernardoSpicer at 1000000000.com>
Who is definitely *not* on any of my lists.
The group sender filter is set to 'Reject' postings from non-members for
which no explicit action is defined.
But, I was still notified. Here's the full header of the message that
Received: from mxs.mail.ru ([126.96.36.199])
by steeplechase-hoa.org (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6K3TmZt017041
for <designreview at steeplechase-hoa.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:30:03
Message-Id: <200607200330.k6K3TmZt017041 at steeplechase-hoa.org>
From: "Bernardo Spicer" <BernardoSpicer at 1000000000.com>
To: <designreview at steeplechase-hoa.org>
Subject: RE: wave surface
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:40:10 -0420
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative";
Why did I get a request to approve this message?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:msapiro at value.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 4:57 PM
> To: Jon D. Slater
> Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Trying to tighten up my security...
> >Since I'm running 2.1.8 (instead of 2.1.6 as the patch requires), I made
> >changes by hand, which broke MM. So now I've put it all back the way it
> >and, at least, MM is back... (Without the patch.)
> The 2.1.6 listinclusion patch applies cleanly to 2.1.8 without change.
> cd path/to/2.1.8mailman/Mailman
> patch -p2 < path_to_listinclusion.patch
> cd path/to/2.1.8mailman
> patch -p1 < path_to_listinclusion.patch
> After applying the patch you need to do 'mailmanctl restart' so
> IncomingRunner will pick up the change to Mailman/Handlers/Moderate.py.
> What broke?
> When you patched by hand, did you preserve indentation exactly?
> Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net> The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 7/14/2006
More information about the Mailman-Users