[Mailman-Users] Bounce issues with Yahoo
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Thu Mar 2 22:04:59 CET 2006
At 12:16 PM -0800 2006-03-02, Harold Paulson wrote:
> Do you really have a *policy* to accept messages that you will never
> deliver, save them to disk, and then generate reject messages for them?
How could the MTA possibly know that the MLM would choose to
reject those messages because the sender is not a subscriber? Or
that the MLM might choose to hold those messages for moderation,
because the sender is not a subscriber.
These are concepts that are totally beyond the scope of the MTA.
There is nothing the MTA can do for you here.
> Or is that simply the way your MTA+MLM is configured by default?
As far as the MTA is concerned, they are *ALL* configured this
way -- assuming that all the appropriate anti-spam and authorization
checks have been passed, they detect that the recipient is a mailing
list, then hand the message over to the MLM.
That's it. That's pretty much all that an MTA is capable of at this level.
> that *policy* really any different from your standpoint, from rejecting
> undeliverable messages during SMTP?
The policy you are proposing is null and void, because the
software in question is not physically capable of acting in the
manner you suggest.
Before chastising others so violently in public, you might do
well to better learn how MTAs and MLMs really work, so that you can
at least make accurate claims about what you believe that the
software in question should be configured to do.
> It would not be inconsistent with your current MLM policy. It is
> simply a better mechanism for implementing it, a better MTA policy, and
> better netizenship to boot.
Go back to basics, learn how MTAs and MLMs actually work.
Then you are free to come back and tell us what you think the
right solution is.
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
LOPSA member since December 2005. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
More information about the Mailman-Users