[Mailman-Users] Continuing problem

Mark Sapiro msapiro at value.net
Tue Mar 21 16:53:31 CET 2006

Dave Filchak wrote:

>However, one thing that still is. I
>have configured the reply to in a way that I thought that the end user
>would see a reply-to address in the headers that was not a reply to the
>list. I have set the following:
>Hide the sender of a message, replacing it with the list address
>(Removes From, Sender and Reply-To fields): yes
>Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message be
>stripped? If so, this will be done regardless of whether an explicit
>Reply-To: header is added by Mailman or not. : no

This should probably be 'Yes'. Since you (or only a few authorized
posters) are doing the posting and you probably don't want to get the
replies, you should strip out any incoming Reply-To: which may have
the poster's address.

>Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is /strongly/
>recommended for most mailing lists. : Explicit Address

Are you sure you have this? It is acting as if you have "This list".

>Explicit Reply-To: header.: newsletter at clientdomain.com
>However I still see:
>From: turningpoints at clientdomain.com
>Reply-to: turningpoints at clientdomain.com
>Should the reply-to address not be newsletter at clientdomain.com?


Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list