[Mailman-Users] Rpms for RHEL/Centos 4?

[Mark Sapiro]

Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
>
>I'm a litle late to the FHS discusion, do you know why the FHS patch
>from RH was not accepted?
>http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg08110.html

At the time John developed the patch, Tokio was pretty much the only
person actively working on the 2.1.x branch. The necessary 'additional
testing' mentioned in the above referenced thread was not done for
lack of resources. This doesn't mean the patch is dead - it is still
potentially a candidate for 2.2.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan