[Mailman-Users] rejection messages
mark at msapiro.net
Fri Jan 2 18:27:17 CET 2009
J.A. Terranson wrote:
> If i reject a posting for exceeding size limits, the reason given
>will be "no reason given" if I reject using the default interface, and
>will only state the correct reason (too bog, please trim) if I reject from
>the "details" interface.
> This is both unintuitive and wrong: It was held for size, the
>first notice says it was held for size, and it is rejected for the reason
>held. Shouldnt the default reason (the reason for being held) be the
Yes, it probably should. It currently doesn't primarily because the
message metadata which contains the reason is not retrieved during
processing of actions from the admindb summary form. I think the
reason for this is historical.
I'm working on a fix.
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
More information about the Mailman-Users