[Mailman-Users] Detecting Autoresponders
beta at admilon.net
Mon Jun 29 07:47:21 CEST 2009
Am/On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:27:22 -0500 schrieb/wrote Grant Taylor:
>On 6/28/2009 8:15 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> I would say the autoresponder is broken if it is responding
>> repeatedly to the same address on behalf of the same recipient. I
>> would also say it's broken it it responds to the list for an
>> individual message (not a digest) unless the list is anonymous and
>> puts the list address in the From: of delevered posts. Finally, this
>> is probably more controversial, but I think it's broken if it can't
>> identify its own autoresponses from Message-ID: or something else and
>> not respond to one of its own messages.
>I *REALLY* /wish/ that was the case. I've got an end user that has set
>up an Out of Office (a.k.a. OoO) auto-reply in Outlook that is replying
>to every frigging message that comes in.
>OoO auto responders usually reply to the From: (header) address of
>messages as they have on concept of the SMTP envelope sender. So if the
>mailing list either sets the From: or Reply-To: header, that's where the
>OoO replies will go.
>I have seen more than a few OoO auto-responders that generate a
>completely new message to the From: / Reply-To: address with out any
>form of identification as to who it is replying to.
>In my opinion, OoO auto responders are probably some of the worst things
>in email. I've been in an environment where two OoO auto responders
>were battling with each other and generated almost 100,000 messages over
we immediately ban people sending autoresponses to a list.
We've put that in our list rules.
Basically it's up to the list participant to set up his/her
autoresponder to not reply to any list messages.
Probably one could set up a filter or something to catch most of the
autoresponses and filter them out.
More information about the Mailman-Users