[Mailman-Users] Setting up redundant mailing lists in OSXSnowLeopard.
joemailgroups at gmail.com
Fri Jan 8 06:56:46 CET 2010
On 1/4/10 9:38 AM, "Mark Sapiro" <mark at msapiro.net> wrote:
> But you probably don't need to mung the reply-to, at least for the
> sublists. Assuming no reply-to munging at all, the original post will
> always be From: the OP and To: the umbrella. Thus reply will go to the
> OP and reply-all to the OP and the umbrella, just as for a
> non-umbrella case.
Shouldn't it be the other way around ? Most lists I either belong or have
belonged to work the opposite way. Reply always sends to the list and Reply
All goes to the list and OP.
> If you want to mung a reply-to, munging the umbrella to reply-to the
> umbrella should suffice as that reply-to will pass through the
> sublists unchanged.
> The only place you have a problem is if the member's MUA offers list
> reply based on the List-Post: header. This then may go to that
> member's sublist only. The answer to this is to set
> include_rfc2369_headers or at least include_list_post_header to No on
> the sublists.
Since I have no way of knowing these details for every subscriber (whether
the subscriber's MUA offers reply based on the List-Post: header as you
stated) would it cause any problems to make it standard procedure to set
those commands to no as you suggested above ?
Thank you for your help.
More information about the Mailman-Users