[Mailman-Users] Help with Bounce Processing
Futchko, Rose
Rose.Futchko at INFORMS.ORG
Wed May 9 14:17:28 CEST 2012
Hello,
Yes, I meant 2.1.5 -- thank you.
This is the additional information:
>>> <mailman at list.informs.org> 5/7/2012 9:58 AM >>>
This is a Mailman mailing list bounce action notice:
List: Listname
Member: email address
Action: Subscription disabled.
Reason: Excessive or fatal bounces.
The triggering bounce notice is attached below.
Questions? Contact the Mailman site administrator at
mailman at list.informs.org.
Received: from [64.56.46.224] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
q47Dm58n027853;
Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47Dm58n027853
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org
sender=transci-logistics-society-bounces at list.informs.org;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.2.1 mail.informs.org q47Dm58n027853
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=informs.org;
s=iol-mail;
t=1336398721; bh=nBoB7gLpyON0aTfYk/86AG+8qdc=;
h=Authentication-Results:Authentication-Results:From:To:Date:
Message-ID:Accept-Language:acceptlanguage:Subject:Sender;
b=DDR/BS
5R1Rg1ZFSefHd9sxFAzBL//DzEFLlSzj8ugS0fU0YaIJBnBo9/0tKK8eAKthApq60EL
NAV4j5wAFhn+5wnJcTRvqfRCsGH4i0ZGjFK3E4cFNFQeylcGs3po6mK4o7ChJn+L9Rq
UqaqYnbP8XM+y7nNLIv53AphKDs0QVU=
Received: from mail.informs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47C8hZH014190
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NO);
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:43 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47C8hZH014190
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org from=elisemh at umd.edu;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
Received: (from root at localhost)
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id q47C8hP3014187;
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:43 -0400
Received: from sdc-mx1.umd.edu (sdc-mx1.umd.edu [128.8.162.150])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
q47C8f8l014174;
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:41 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47C8f8l014174
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org from=elisemh at umd.edu;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:
ArsCAKC6p0+ACAzogWdsb2JhbABEgkanDwGDEYZTAQEWJieCEAMFIAgBXQElAQEBCgoUBRAP
DCYBBAERAQgGDId0C7EkiQmQPGMEkBoBiS2PfQ
Received: from oitpmxht01.umd.edu (HELO exch.mail.umd.edu)
([128.8.12.232])
by sdc-mx1.umd.edu with ESMTP; 07 May 2012 08:08:40 -0400
Received: from oitmxcms01vi.AD.UMD.EDU ([169.254.1.122]) by
OITPMXHT01.AD.UMD.EDU ([128.8.12.232]) with mapi;
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:40 -0400
From: Elise Miller-Hooks <elisemh at umd.edu>
To: "transci-logistics-section at list.informs.org"
<transci-logistics-section at list.informs.org>,
"transci-logistics-society at list.informs.org"
<transci-logistics-society at list.informs.org>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 08:08:37 -0400
Thread-Topic: A great loss for the TSL Society
Thread-Index: Ac0sSaLy16gsDbusR+ShPb1Nsm9MIA==
Message-ID:
<0D78E3BEE1F5C04CA3641F214EE381AD01A4EBA4801A at OITMXCMS01VI.AD.UMD.EDU>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=2.9
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable
version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
mail.informs.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 May 2012 09:48:04 -0400
Cc:
Subject: [Transci-logistics-society] A great loss for the TSL Society
X-BeenThere: transci-logistics-society at list.informs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transportation Science and Logistics Society of INFORMS
<transci-logistics-society.list.informs.org>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://list.informs.org/mailman/listinfo/transci-logistics-society>,
<mailto:transci-logistics-society-request at list.informs.org?subject=unsub
scribe>
List-Archive:
<http://list.informs.org/pipermail/transci-logistics-society>
List-Post: <mailto:transci-logistics-society at list.informs.org>
List-Help:
<mailto:transci-logistics-society-request at list.informs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<http://list.informs.org/mailman/listinfo/transci-logistics-society>,
<mailto:transci-logistics-society-request at list.informs.org?subject=subsc
ribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1216496403=="
Sender: transci-logistics-society-bounces at list.informs.org
Errors-To: transci-logistics-society-bounces at list.informs.org
Return-path: <>
Received: from mail.informs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q47ER99A006791
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NO)
for
<transci-logistics-society-bounces at list.informs.org.procmail>;
Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:10 -0400
X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 mail.informs.org
q47ER99A006791
Authentication-Results: mail.informs.org
from=MAILER-DAEMON at mail.informs.org;
sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.2.1 mail.informs.org q47ER99A006791
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=informs.org;
s=iol-mail;
t=1336400836; bh=r/uqa39i9pKtHAwopuBeggH2Cus=; h=Date:From:
Message-Id:To:Subject:Auto-Submitted;
b=rwpTPxmFKIgMnHAesV2Zf6JDRH
BdYIdKlntNcVfBWoTCzbsdoC9xR0fQ1oIehAPHZKF8NBIaVR2ENgw+LxqIRlDSv6VLi
NvjEkjUFOt9vOjH1aoXj3Bz8h238kx8JeOaOaH6QW9EaqqsVis0cLq9YwVD01EwoeCy
FS9CNF2l9xU=
Received: (from root at localhost)
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id q47ER9dQ006788
for transci-logistics-society-bounces at list.informs.org.procmail;
Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:09 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by mail.informs.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) id q47ER58i028269;
Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:05 -0400
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:27:05 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON at mail.informs.org>
Message-Id: <201205071427.q47ER58i028269 at mail.informs.org>
To: <transci-logistics-society-bounces at list.informs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="q47ER58i028269.1336400825/mail.informs.org"
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.9
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
mail.informs.org
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.informs.org
Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost
Arrival-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; kenneth.kuhn at canterbury.ac.nz
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.canterbury.ac.nz
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal
user:kenneth.kuhn at canterbury.ac.nz
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:53:26 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; martin.savelsbergh at csiro.au
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; act-mx.csiro.au
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:54:06 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; dlagana at deis.unica.it
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; deis.unica.it
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:54:24 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; muhammad.mazahir-6 at etudiants.ensam.eu
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; mail-in.ensam.eu
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 511 Destinataire inconnu - Recipient unknown
-(muhammad.mazahir-6 at etudiants.ensam.eu)
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:39 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; kroodbergen at fac.fbk.eur.nl
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mercury.fbk.eur.nl
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <kroodbergen at fac.fbk.eur.nl>: Recipient
addressrejected: User unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:43 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; daduna at fhwr-berlin.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; fhwr-berlin.de
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:57:58 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a.strauss at lancaster.ac.uk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; whobblebury.lancs.ac.uk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient address
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:04:41 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; eduardo.soares at latop.com.br
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx5.infolink.com.br
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554
5.7.1<64-56-46-224.isp.comcastbusiness.net[64.56.46.224]>: Clienthost
rejected: =myspam gold= We don't accept Direct Deliveryfrom
Dial-up/DSL/CABLE/Wireless/3G networks. If you are NOTdoing E-mail
Marketing/Opt-in/Opt-out/SPAM/UCE (which areforbidden here), please
contact abuse at infolink.com.br with thecomplete ERROR MESSAGE to be
analized.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:04:46 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; brka at man.dtu.dk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; filter2.ait.dtu.dk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <brka at man.dtu.dk>... Sorry, no mailbox
here by thatname or mailbox is over quota
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:30 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; raist at man.dtu.dk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; filter2.ait.dtu.dk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <raist at man.dtu.dk>... Sorry, no mailbox
here bythat name or mailbox is over quota
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:30 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; liebchen at math.tu-berlin.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.tu-berlin.de
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Recipient verify failed
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:06:56 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; k.akartunali at ms.unimelb.edu.au
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; puffer.ms.unimelb.edu.au
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 <k.akartunali at ms.unimelb.edu.au>: Recipient
addressrejected: User unknown in local recipient table
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:10:15 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; combste at ornl.gov
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mta02.ornl.gov
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:15:07 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; jlancaster at qatarairways.com.qa
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.qatarairways.com.qa
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:15:50 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; schinaso at transmartconsulting.gr
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; transmartconsulting.gr
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Host unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:19:19 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; kwanghun.chung at uclouvain.be
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 <kwanghun.chung at uclouvain.be>: Recipient
addressrejected: unknown address
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:21:47 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; sehernan at uniandes.edu.co
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; avmx02.uniandes.edu.co
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 Recipient address rejected: User
unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:24:44 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; jshan at ust.hk
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.ust.hk
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 5.3.0 <jshan at ust.hk>... Recipient address no
longerexists
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:25:27 -0400
The original message was received at Mon, 7 May 2012 09:50:13 -0400 from
localhost [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<kenneth.kuhn at canterbury.ac.nz>
(reason: 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user:
kenneth.kuhn at canterbury.ac.nz) <martin.savelsbergh at csiro.au>
(reason: 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.) <dlagana at deis.unica.it>
(reason: 550 Host unknown)
<muhammad.mazahir-6 at etudiants.ensam.eu>
(reason: 511 Destinataire inconnu - Recipient unknown -
(muhammad.mazahir-6 at etudiants.ensam.eu))
<kroodbergen at fac.fbk.eur.nl>
(reason: 550 5.1.1 <kroodbergen at fac.fbk.eur.nl>: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown) <daduna at fhwr-berlin.de>
(reason: 550 Host unknown)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:mark at msapiro.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 7:25 PM
To: Futchko, Rose
Cc: mailman-users at python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Help with Bounce Processing
On 5/7/2012 2:17 PM, Futchko, Rose wrote:
> We are using Mailman 2.15 and have an unusual problem that I was
> hoping that someone can help me with.
There is no 2.15. Do you mean 2.1.5?
> We have close to 109 lists running
> successfully, however there are times when bounce processing sends the
> following message (over 100 times) in the span of a few hours to one
> user/subscriber to the list. They are not the admin:
>
>
>
> This is a Mailman mailing list bounce action notice:
Without seeing the complete message with all headers, it is virtually
impossible to guess what may be happening. Can you post a complete
message example with all headers?
--
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list