[Mailman-Users] what constitutes spam?
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat May 19 10:47:24 CEST 2012
Anne Wainwright writes:
> I have sinned and stand repentant. I hate spam as much as anyone and we
> get plenty to deal with. Somehow the Viagra and get rich emails didn't
> seem to stand on the same level as a once-off invite.
They don't, from the point of view of the sender or society at large.
But for the recipient....
> As an aside, I have to ask whether the 'invite' feature in Mailman has a
Sure. As Mark points out, it confirms the intention of the user to
join, which gives you the "double opt-in" property that gives a
conservative litmus test for "not spam".
I think it might be a useful question to ask, "how can the invite
feature be made more functional?"
In particular, if you've written a careful email, answering an
inquiry, I see nothing spammy about adding a Mailman invite to that
... if it were possible, which currently it isn't, from any mail
client I know of. OTOH, you could write that email using Mailman's
"invite" interface, but I bet you'd get tired of that real quick.
More information about the Mailman-Users