[Mailman-Users] DMARC and Reply-To lines with from_is_list munging.
ges+lists at wingfoot.org
Tue May 6 23:36:18 CEST 2014
On 5/6/14, 5:31 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I went back and forth with this. Initially, if first_strip_reply_to was
> Yes and reply_goes_to_list was This list or Explicit address, I didn't
> put the poster's address in Reply-To:
> I finally decided it was of overriding importance to expose the posters
> address to enable off list (or non-list member) replies, and this
> warranted breaking the previous Reply-To: header munging options semantics.
> I am willing to consider changing this, either to treat Reply-To:
> differently for Wrap Message since the original headers are in the
> wrapped message in that case, or to just go back to not adding the
> poster's address to Reply-To: as in my initial paragraph above.
> However, I need more feedback from the community before making changes.
> I could always add yet another setting, but I hate that idea for
> multiple reasons.
Can there be an option somewhere in between "anonymous_list" and
"reply_goes_to_list?" One where it can strip the poster's email from the
reply-to, but leave the other headers alone?
More information about the Mailman-Users