[Mailman-Users] DMARC and Reply-To lines with from_is_list munging.
fmouse at fmp.com
Tue May 6 23:42:43 CEST 2014
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:31 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I am willing to consider changing this, either to treat Reply-To:
> differently for Wrap Message since the original headers are in the
> wrapped message in that case, or to just go back to not adding the
> poster's address to Reply-To: as in my initial paragraph above.
> However, I need more feedback from the community before making changes.
> I could always add yet another setting, but I hate that idea for
> multiple reasons.
It's ugly, but having yet another switch seems to me to be the only way
to handle this. Having the poster's address in Reply-To: is the only
way to address the information loss implied by the necessary change to
the From: header, especially for MUAs that expose only the address
comment and not the actual address, and especially for subscribers who
are not technically inclined and wish to simply hit "reply" and get a
reply to the original author.
This _should_ be a matter of choice for list admins, even if it seems
that they're already overloaded with choices pursuant to addressing the
DMARC issue. Until something better comes along, we're just going to
have to deal with it.
Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works if you let it"
FMP Computer Services |
512-259-1190 | --- The Roadie
More information about the Mailman-Users