[Mailman-Users] The "right" way to reply to a mailing list / Re:

[Roel Wagenaar]

"A.K. Eyma" <ayma at tip.nl> wrote:

 <snip>

> Having all mail of a list come in with [listname] first in each subject line
> is more tidy. In that way you would differentiate at one glance in your inbox
> between
> 


Filtering maillist messages to a folder per list is a far more tidy way of
dealing with the problem of identifying messages.

Hell even Thunderbird can do that:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/organize-your-messages-using-filters



> Re: [Mailman-Users] The "right" way
> 
> for responses that have been sent offlist to you
> 
> and
> 
> [Mailman-Users] Re: The "right" way
> 
> for responses that have been sent onlist, i.e. via the list.
> 
> [] is the list's 'stamp' on mails, why insert it after Re:?
> 
> I am making sense, really! ;))
> 
> 
> kind regards, Aayko Eyma
> 


-- 
Roel Wagenaar,

Linux-User #469851 with the Linux Counter; http://linuxcounter.net/

Antw.: Omdat het de volgorde verstoord waarin mensen tekst lezen.
Vraag: Waarom is top-posting een slechte gewoonte?
Antw.: Top-posting.
Vraag: Wat is het meest ergerlijke in e-mail?

Diplomacy is the art of letting someone else get your way.