[Mailman-Users] The "right" way to reply to a mailing list
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Wed Mar 25 02:42:23 CET 2015
Peter Shute writes:
> I've seen a plain text section that didn't match the html version
> (if I'm remembering that incident correctly).
Indeed, occasionally you'll see the arrogant "your MUA doesn't deal
with MIME properly" notice in a text/plain MIME part, rather than in
> > Nonetheless, IMHO HTMLized email the way of the future so
> > we'd better get used to dealing with it.
> Yes, whether we like it or not. It's a pity though that such
> complex HTML is used. Do we really need anything more than the
> ability to bold and underline? I'd be happy with some of the basic
> Structured Text formatting commands, which have the advantage that
> they're still intelligible in plain text.
You'd be amazed what teenage girls will do in an HTML email using a
WYSIWYG editor. The point of the brain damage is like proprietary
drivers in the Linux kernel: trying to provide features that the
competition doesn't, in a non-standard way so that they can't just fix
More information about the Mailman-Users