[Mailman-Users] Additional questions about ban_list
cnulk at scu.edu
Fri Oct 16 00:25:00 CEST 2015
On 10/15/2015 3:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 02:37 PM, Chris Nulk wrote:
>> The question now is if I change the following in Mailman/MailList.py
>> def GetBannedPattern(self, email):
>> """Returns matched entry in ban_list if email matches.
>> Otherwise returns None.
Am I on the correct path?
Great. Thank you for the help.
>> Mark, if you have the time and/or inclination, could you explain your
>> comments about
>> Allowing @list_name in ban_list is a simple code modification if you
>> don't care if various 'error' log messages such as list references
>> itself or references non-existent list refer to
>> 'subscribe_auto_approval' even if the error is in ban_list.
> In Mailman 2.1.19 much of the code in the GetBannedPattern() method was
> moved to a new GetPattern() method which optionally supports the
> @listname convention.
Okay. I have made a number of code changes to 2.1.9 and several of the
dropped out/were not needed when we went to 2.1.18-1. There still are a
number of changes that keep us from switching without taking a close
look at needs to be done. I have recorded all the changes I have made,
the problem is finding the time to work on it.
Thank you for the information though.
> This was done for subscribe_auto_approval, and
> while it's kind of kludgy, the error log messages that you have above
> for 'Ban_list listfor %s references own list' and 'Ban_list for list %s
> references non-existent list %s' refer to subscribe_auto_approval rather
> than ban_list or something variable.
> Thus if you had 2.1.19 or later, the code change is much simpler if you
> don't mind the error log messages saying subscribe_auto_approval when
> they might mean ban_list.
Okay. That makes sense.
Thanks again for the help.
More information about the Mailman-Users