[Mailman-Users] cause of bounces
dmaziuk at bmrb.wisc.edu
Wed Oct 18 17:42:40 EDT 2017
On 10/18/2017 04:26 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 02:10 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> Do I understand you correctly to mean to create the signature before
> applying transport encoding?
>> Only, you can't do that on the MX, it has to be done on the client.
> Why can't you do it at the MX?
Because the very first $relayhost may apply transport encoding. You have
to compute the hash before that happens.
>> DKIM is designed to produce false positives. Which means DKIM-based
>> tests will have low specificity
> My experience ~> opinion, save for mailing lists, differs. In fact,
> most of the email that I receive passes DKIM.
That does not contradict what I said. Low specificity means low
probability of detection of "bad stuff". I.e. it doesn't mean much that
most of it passes.
> I don't think DKIM (or SPF or DMARC) have /anything/ to do with spam
> detection. SPF is for envelope sender authorization. DKIM is for
> message integrity. DMARC is for policy and reporting. None of that has
> anything to do with spam detection / filtering.
Ohkay, so what exactly am I the end user is supposed to need it for?
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Mailman-Users