[Mailman-Users] OT - Smart .forward replacement?
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Sun Nov 25 15:28:21 EST 2018
On 11/25/18 1:03 PM, Lindsay Haisley (linode) wrote:
> mail redirected through a .forward will always fail SPF validation.
That is not always accurate. It is relatively easy to configure an MTA
to support Sender Rewriting Scheme, either for everything that is sent
out or just things that don't originate from the system.
Thus a .forward is not guaranteed to fail SPF validation. In fact, I
would expect SPF validation to succeed on servers that are configured
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Mailman-Users