[Mailman3-dev] Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: [Mailman-Developers] Debate about Mailman on BytesForAll

[Barry Warsaw]

(Removing mailman-developers)

On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 17:02, Brad Knowles wrote:

> >  Your best defense is to not use SQLite for files on a network filesystem."
> 
> 	Fair enough.  Are we looking for something where use on a network 
> filesystem is an issue?

My answer to that would be, if you want distributed operation for MM3,
use a client/server database like MySQL or PostgreSQL.  As far as the
qrunners go, it shouldn't matter because of the way the hash space
algorithm is designed.

> 	Or do we care more about other issues, such as performance (where 
> I think BerkeleyDB would probably win), or interface methods/language 
> (where SQL might be preferred)?

As I mentioned in my other email, ease of installation, use, and
administration is very high on my list.  I don't want performance to go
through the toilet, but the default configuration doesn't have to be
able to handle AOL-sized traffic. :)

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman3-dev/attachments/20040826/b0e853e9/attachment.pgp