[Mailman3-dev] Suggested Features
barry at python.org
Mon Mar 15 21:57:07 EST 2004
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 18:52, Mark A. Mandel wrote:
> Maybe I don't belong on THIS list, because I'm not a developer.
> Pipermail is not part of Mailman? Ah.
Yes and no. Pipermail was a separate project for its early life, then
it was fused into Mailman and now I think that's its only incarnation.
On the whole, Pipermail was an excellent addition, providing very
important functionality. But everyone agrees it needs work. Designing
and implementing an archiver is A Project Unto Itself and I don't want
to hold up Mailman 3 waiting for an archiver rewrite.
> I'm not asking for a better archiver, as I understand it; just a change
> in the HTML template in which the archive levels are presented. Even if
> the monthly archive pages and the individual posts (such as
> .../pipermail/LISTNAME/2004-March/date.html and
> ...//pipermail/cyp-list/2004-March/000123.html) had links BACK TO THE
> MAIN ARCHIVE PAGE (.../pipermail/LISTNAME/) -- a single static link in
> the HTML templates -- it would be a real improvement.
That's a possibility.
> The posts and the monthly archive pages now have links saying
> "More information about the LISTNAME mailing list"
> "More info on this list... "
> which both point to
> If that can be generated, so can a link to .../pipermail/LISTNAME/ .
> So... where do I ask, if not here?
I'd ask around on mailman-developers, since this could be a Mailman 2.1
More information about the Mailman3-Dev