[Matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] mpl governance

Jason Grout jason at jasongrout.org
Wed Aug 31 12:20:49 EDT 2016


FYI, here is the (beginning of the) public discussion of the Jupyter
governance model we were talking about:
https://github.com/jupyter/governance/issues/19

Jason

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:23 PM Matthias Bussonnier <
bussonniermatthias at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> To extend on what Jason said, the discussion have started privately on
> the Jupyter Steering council mailing list, we'll move it to a public
> space but we want to shorten what have been posted and make sure it's
> suitable for public consumption.
>
> --
> M
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jason Grout <jason at jasongrout.org> wrote:
> > We're about to have some discussions in Jupyter about our governance
> model,
> > and probably tweak it now that we have more experience with it. While
> that
> > experience may not transfer to matplotlib's situation, it still might be
> > good to see that discussion before making huge changes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:40 AM Paul Hobson <pmhobson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think this is a good idea.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Thomas Caswell <tcaswell at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Folks,
> >>>
> >>> Following up on last month's email, are there any comments, for or
> >>> against, adopting the Jupyter governance model and the mechanism of
> >>> ratifying the adoption?
> >>>
> >>> Tom
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 6:32 PM Thomas Caswell <tcaswell at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> During the sprints at SciPy Mike Droettboom and I started to adapt the
> >>>> Jupyter governance documents for matplotlib.
> >>>>
> >>>> We are doing this in the open, and a pull request of the changes is
> at:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/matplotlib/governance/pull/1
> >>>>
> >>>> To be clear, this is a work in progress and is not final or in force.
> >>>>
> >>>> We propose the mechanism for ratifying the these documents is to,
> after
> >>>> input from the community, have the current "matplotlib Executive
> Committee"
> >>>> (the signers of the FSA with NUMFocus) vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tom
> >>>>
> >>>> ps A very similar email was sent to the matplotlib-devel list on July
> 17
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> >>> Matplotlib-users at python.org
> >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/matplotlib-users
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> >> Matplotlib-devel at python.org
> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> > Matplotlib-devel at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/matplotlib-devel/attachments/20160831/a68bab23/attachment.html>


More information about the Matplotlib-devel mailing list