[MATRIX-SIG] Re: NumPy in the Python 1.5 era

[Paul F. Dubois]

We (LLNL) are taking over responsibility for it, and that will include doing
the documentation. Now, if we could only figure out how it works... (:->.

----------
> From: Janko Hauser <jhauser@ifm.uni-kiel.de>
> To: matrix-sig@python.org
> Subject: [MATRIX-SIG] Re: NumPy in the Python 1.5 era
> Date: Wednesday, October 29, 1997 12:06 PM
> 
> If there are plans for a new version of NumPy (will this be a final
> version?) I would suggest that the documentation needs an update
> to. Especially for interactiv use it would be good to have more
> doc-strings in the code itself. I volunteer to start with the
> doc-strings. I will manly use the current written information and put
> it in the appropiate places.
> 
> Should something like gendoc used for this? Is there a perfomance hit
> if there are the doc-strings in often used functions?
> 
> I know that David Ascher has some more documentation, should this be
> integrated in the distribution? Are there any other big librarys,
> which should be included?
> 
> At the end, I was not at the IPC6. Is there some new information about
> future plans regarding NumPy?
> 
> __Janko
> 
> 
> _______________
> MATRIX-SIG  - SIG on Matrix Math for Python
> 
> send messages to: matrix-sig@python.org
> administrivia to: matrix-sig-request@python.org
> _______________

_______________
MATRIX-SIG  - SIG on Matrix Math for Python

send messages to: matrix-sig@python.org
administrivia to: matrix-sig-request@python.org
_______________