[PYTHON META-SIG] Proposal for new SIG
Jim Fulton
jim.fulton@digicool.com
Tue, 30 Jul 1996 13:00:24 -0400
Casper Stoel wrote:
>
> Jim Fulton writes:
> >
> > Ken Manheimer wrote:
> > >
> > > Seems like the only question about the creation of the new sig is its
> > > name. Since i didn't see any alternatives suggested, i put out the
> > > following straw-man candidates:
> > >
> > > do-sig catchy but slightly obscure
> > > distobj-sig awkward but more obvious
> > >
> > > I actually think the obscurity of the catchy name might be a hindrance,
> > > but don't have strong feelings about it. I'd say anyone with strong
> > > feelings on the matter (including david, if you really like 'do-sig')
> > > should speak up, and they can tip the scales, we'll decide this, and
> > > comission the sig (when barry gets a moment to create the mailing list
> > > and i can put the sig dirs in place) - probly tomorrow?
> >
> > I like do-sig much better.
>
> What about:
>
> doe-sig still catchy but slightly more obvious
Oh, deer.
--
Jim Fulton Digital Creations
jim@digicool.com 540.371.6909
=================
META-SIG - SIG on Python.Org SIGs and Mailing Lists
send messages to: meta-sig@python.org
administrivia to: meta-sig-request@python.org
=================