[PYTHON META-SIG] would-be pattern-sig cont'd

M.-A. Lemburg lemburg@uni-duesseldorf.de
Tue, 01 Apr 1997 21:33:57 +0200


Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> 
> Dinu Gherman writes:
>  > Hello all,
>  >
>  > back from Easter vacation I see a bursting mailbox indicating
>  > that we are moving again a little bit on the python pattern
>  > issue. Marc has added to the initial proposal w/o knowing of
>  > the one I sent to Barry just before last weekend. I am sorry
>  > I did not spread it further. Following Barry's suggestions,
>  > it's much more concise now and less fuzzy. Also, it names
>  > some deliverables to head for. Read yourself below!
> 
> I like this new one a /lot/ more, mostly because it is dramatically
> shorter.  However, it still contains a lot of unnecessary verbage
> relating to time management and professional advice.  I would like to
> see much of that chopped, just as indicated in my former post.  By
> that point the charter would be getting /really/ short, so perhaps it
> would be okay to actually /add/ some additional technical content.

[put your favourite flame against non-constructive criticism here]

Well then... go ahead... we're all listening...

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg           mailto:lemburg@uni-duesseldorf.de


_______________
META-SIG  - SIG on Python.Org SIGs and Mailing Lists

send messages to: meta-sig@python.org
administrivia to: meta-sig-request@python.org
_______________