[PYTHON META-SIG] would-be pattern-sig cont'd
M.-A. Lemburg
lemburg@uni-duesseldorf.de
Tue, 01 Apr 1997 21:33:57 +0200
Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
>
> Dinu Gherman writes:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > back from Easter vacation I see a bursting mailbox indicating
> > that we are moving again a little bit on the python pattern
> > issue. Marc has added to the initial proposal w/o knowing of
> > the one I sent to Barry just before last weekend. I am sorry
> > I did not spread it further. Following Barry's suggestions,
> > it's much more concise now and less fuzzy. Also, it names
> > some deliverables to head for. Read yourself below!
>
> I like this new one a /lot/ more, mostly because it is dramatically
> shorter. However, it still contains a lot of unnecessary verbage
> relating to time management and professional advice. I would like to
> see much of that chopped, just as indicated in my former post. By
> that point the charter would be getting /really/ short, so perhaps it
> would be okay to actually /add/ some additional technical content.
[put your favourite flame against non-constructive criticism here]
Well then... go ahead... we're all listening...
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg mailto:lemburg@uni-duesseldorf.de
_______________
META-SIG - SIG on Python.Org SIGs and Mailing Lists
send messages to: meta-sig@python.org
administrivia to: meta-sig-request@python.org
_______________