[meta-sig] PROPOSAL: Python Scarecrow SIG

[Roger Masse]

I'm for putting them together for several reasons:

	1) I don't think the static-types work alone is
	enough to warrent its own sig at this point

	2) The static types work would be based on whatever
	comes out of the interfaces work

	3) I'd like to bring the class/types discussions
	into the fray (off of egroups) to foster more
	participation from the community

Of course, this assumes Jim is still willing to champion
such a beast with a 'modified' charter...

I like 'types-sig' for the name.


Regards,

	Roger E. Masse, Systems Engineer
	Corporation for National Research Initiatives
	1895 Preston White Drive, Suite 100
	Reston, Virginia, USA  20191
	rmasse@CNRI.Reston.VA.US 

	To find out why Python rules,
	see: <http://www.python.org/>