[meta-sig] IDE sig
Greg Stein
gstein@lyra.org
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:36:13 -0800 (PST)
This sounds more like a discussion forum than a "normal" SIG. Normally, we
try to define specific deliverables from a SIG. Otherwise, it just kind of
devolves into a quiet, lingering mailing list. Is there a sufficient
volume such that this needs move from (say) c.l.py to a new SIG? Can you
define some deliverables?
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Ken Seehof wrote:
> We need an IDE sig.
>
> There are a number of new IDE development projects in the works. Also,
> many IDE features would be quite useful in any embeded scripting
> scenario, so the scope of this sig would go beyond the obvious projects
> such as PythonWin, Boa Constructor, wxPython IDE, and Neural Integrator
> (my project).
>
> Shared code and interoperability between IDE systems would be the
> primary objectives of the IDE sig.
>
> Subtopics:
> - source code editors
> - code generation (wizards)
> - integrated debuggers
> - integrated source code control
> - integrated c extension module build tools
>
> Ken Seehof
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Meta-sig maillist - Meta-sig@python.org
> http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/meta-sig
>
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/