Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:14:10 -0800 (PST)
> +1 on recreating the Locator SIG. However, I'd call it the CPyAN SIG because
> people will immediately understand what it is about. And let's not get
> caught up in "needing it to be more generic." We're talking about a CPyAN
> here, and that is a huge problem all by itself.
+1 on the SIG -1 on the names locator and/or catalog. I'm not as unfond of
CPyAN, but it's not as pronounceable.
I'm rather fond of the idea of it being SPAM-SIG (Super(?) Python
Accessory (?) Modules), but spam carries other negative connotations. On
the other hand, it is Monty Python related and a word play.
_Deirdre * http://www.sfknit.org * http://www.deirdre.net
"You had thesaurus flakes for breakfast again, didn't you?"
-- Eric Williams