[meta-sig] SIG Proposal: Network Management
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:15:42 -0200
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I understand that there is a need for a tool. But the real question
> is, are there enough people who want to *work* on *creating* the tool
> to warrant the need for a SIG? The main cause for SIG failure is not
> lack of posters so much as lack of contributions towards the goal of
> the SIG. Take for example Rodrigo's reply (just because he's the
> first person to reply :-). He votes "yes" (I have counted and
> recounted his vote three times manually and it's still a single "yes"
> vote :-) but he doesn't commit to do any of the work.
Amazing, could you smell my reticence ? :o)
I voted yes, because I'd like to see people working
on it. Certainly interested in using it, not-so-interested
in working on it now (sorry, got a master thesis to finish).
You got me Guido, touché.
> Without real contributions there's no SIG.
I propose to Ilya to start the development at some place
(if not already!) and ask for contributors at the forums.
After a while the answer to the questions raised here will
be answered naturally.
Computer Engineer (GPr Sistemas Ltda) firstname.lastname@example.org
MSc Student of Reflection (IC- UNICAMP) Rodrigo.Senra@ic.unicamp.br
http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~921234 (see also http://www.gpr.com.br)