[Neuroimaging] Website Update

[Ben Cipollini]

If it's just a matter of configuring a variable like the base url of the
website, then I say no--no problem.

If we have to work around it by manipulating URLs in funky ways inside
templates... then I say, probably.

I don't find this to be a Jekyll issue as much as how the different
publishing sources expose Jekyll config. If they simply set the baseurl
properly for ya, this would all be so simple! That's exactly what that
config variable is there for... and Vanessa's using it quite properly in
all the template code.

Ben



On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Ben Cipollini <bcipolli at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Vanessa,
> >
> > Another solution is simply to send Jekyll the proper baseurl in all
> cases.
> > In my eyes, that's the simplest and intended solution. I just can't
> > understand why it's so hard to do easily, or at all.
> >
> > The relative paths thing is another solution, but I feel that's a
> > workaround--Jekyll has the baseurl defined and configurable, it's clearly
> > part of the software design.
> >
> > Hope we find an elegant solution soon :)
> > Ben
>
> Forgive my anxiety, but this conversation worries me.  It seems to me,
> that if we are having to do some serious custom configuration to make
> a jekyll site work, it goes rather a long way to defeating the purpose
> of jekyll as compared to - say - sphinx - in that it makes the site
> more difficult and fragile to maintain.   Is that worry reasonable do
> you think?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> Neuroimaging mailing list
> Neuroimaging at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/neuroimaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/neuroimaging/attachments/20150823/36df5b4e/attachment.html>